Mario Martinez Serrano vs Tristan Mccormick Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 01 Aug at 09:29 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Martinez Serrano vs T. Mccormick

ESP
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Serrano 1 - 0 Mccormick
They have played 3 sets in total, with Mario Martinez Serrano winning 2 and Tristan Mccormick winning 1. The last match between Mario Martinez Serrano and Tristan Mccormick was at the M15 Xativa, 01-08-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Draw getting the victory 2-6 7-6(2) 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Serrano | 1 |
| Mccormick | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) M15 Xativa(08-01-25)
M. M. Serrano vs T. Mccormick H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 60.00% (30-20) | Career Total W/L | 55.87% (138-109) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. M. Serrano vs T. Mccormick Match Preview:
- Mccormick has a slight edge in recent second serve points won, recording 46.6% compared to Serrano's 45.6%. Could this make a difference in the outcome?
- When returning opponents' second serves, Serrano has a small advantage, winning 45.71% of points against Mccormick's 44.98%.
- For first serve returns, Serrano appears stronger, achieving 26.91% compared to Mccormick's 25.85%.
- Mccormick excels at saving breakpoints with 59.8% success, overshadowing Serrano's 51.79%—an important factor during crucial match moments.
- Over the past year, Serrano boasts a higher match win rate of 63.16%, whereas Mccormick has 55.84%.
- Mccormick's preferred surface is Grass with a win rate of 67%, while Serrano fares best on Hard courts, claiming 64% victories.
- Serrano has consistently faced tougher opponents, with an average ranking of 250.58 compared to Mccormick's 346.73, reflecting different competitive environments.
- In deciding sets, Serrano is more reliable, winning 75% of such scenarios, whereas Mccormick achieves a 57% win rate.
- Mccormick shines in break point conversion, achieving 29.46% of opportunities, a considerably higher rate than Serrano's 16.33%.
Editorial Prediction (August 1, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming tennis match promises to be a close contest given the nuanced differences in the players' performances. Mccormick outperforms Serrano slightly in second serve points won, which could influence rally outcomes.
Serrano, however, shows a stronger ability in return games, especially against first serves. This skill may enable her to pressure Mccormick more effectively.
Although Mccormick has proven adept at saving breakpoints, Serrano's significant advantage in converting deciding sets might give her the mental edge under high-pressure conditions.
In terms of break point conversion, Mccormick excels, which could play a critical role should there be many break opportunities during the match.
Factoring in the above metrics, coupled with Serrano's experience against generally higher-ranked opponents and superior deciding set performance, Serrano is more likely to emerge victorious in this encounter.
Mario Martinez Serrano vs Tristan Mccormick Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. M. Serrano vs T. Mccormick H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 17 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 3:7:35 | Average Match Time | 3:7:35 |
| 79% (79/100) | 1st Serve % | 63% (67/107) |
| 61% (48/79) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (43/67) |
| 43% (9/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (20/40) |
| 33% (4/12) | Break Pts Won % | 45% (5/11) |
| 41% (44/107) | Return Points Win % | 43% (43/100) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. M. Serrano Recent Matches Played
T. Mccormick Recent Matches Played

M. M. Serrano vs T. Mccormick Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.00% (30/20) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.87% (138/109) |
| 56.90% (66/50) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.50% (315/263) |
| 52.35% (580/528) | Games Win/Loss | 51.82% (2954/2746) |
| 61.11% (11/7) | Hard Win/Loss | 54.00% (54/46) |
| 60.00% (18/12) | Clay Win/Loss | 57.02% (65/49) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56.67% (17/13) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 66.67% (2/1) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.54 |
| 39 | Aces Total | 1506 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.32 |
| 101 | Total Double Faults | 892 |
| 1:2:24 | Average Match Time | 1:43:22 |
| 261.12 | Average Opponent Rank | 460.54 |
| 63% (1183/1881) | 1st Serve % | 59% (9031/15282) |
| 67% (796/1183) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (6665/9031) |
| 46% (321/698) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (3168/6252) |
| 46% (82/180) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (534/1400) |
| 41% (767/1864) | Return Points Win % | 37% (5832/15713) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 41.38% (24/34) |
| 60.00% (30/20) | Futures W/L | 60.32% (114/75) |
| 60% (30/50) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (137/244) |
| 64% (7/11) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (56/104) |
| 63% (10/16) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (48/87) |
| 87% (30/26) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (132/112) |
| 13% (30/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (132/20) |
| 20% (20/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (115/26) |